AI infrastructure for payment reliability and programmable debt.

Why now

The real business is building on chain.

Stablecoin supply, USD billions
$123B $199B $308B $678B
Dec ’23
Dec ’24
Dec ’25
Dec ’26 · expected
Agents data on x402, 2026
$600M
Annualized payment volume
69,000
Active paying agents
Last 30 Days
75.41M
Transactions
$24.24M
Volume
94.06K
Buyers
22K
Sellers
OpenAI Stripe OpenAI and Stripe’s Agentic Commerce Protocol put checkout inside ChatGPT
x402 now sits under the Linux Foundation, with Visa, Mastercard, Google and AWS among its 40 members.
the rails went live
Feb, Jun 2025
Stripe bought Bridge, then Privy
Buying its way onto the rails rather than building them
March 2026
Tempo mainnet
Stripe and Paradigm shipped a chain built only for payments
July 2026
Robinhood Chain
Tokenised equities and stablecoins, on 100ms blocks
Now
Circle’s Arc mainnet
BlackRock, DTCC, Visa, Mastercard and ICE are founding validators
The problem

Traditional payments have 50 years of plumbing behind them.Agent payments have none.

Agentic Payments are bleeding

How an AI agent breaks In Real Business
Match the invoice

Why the agent fails: no way to verify. A missing field means the payment cannot be validated.

Check the mandate

Why the agent fails: no spending limits. A wallet with no ceiling is a security hole.

Lock the price

Why the agent fails: no price guarantee. The quote expires while it is still thinking.

Move the money

Why the agent fails: no execution safety. Wrong gas or slippage, and the transaction fails.

Reconcile it

Why the agent fails: no reconciliation layer. It can pay, but nothing can confirm what was paid.

Handle the exception

Why the agent fails: no recovery logic. When something breaks, its only move is to try again.

The bigger problem

Every business breathes on credit,AI agent need it, too.

Gap between AI Agents and Real business
What the business actually needs
Invoice
30 / 60 / 90-day terms
Credit
Financing
Transfer
Repayment
Money moves in 90 days, and an AI agent has no way to represent any of the middle.
AI Agent can only do These 2
Solution

FlowNote: payments that learn from every failure,and debt that runs as code.

AI agents
Yours, your customer’s, or OpenAI’s
FlowNote OS
Every action passes through here
VALIDATE
before it runs
EXECUTE
once, or not at all
OBSERVE
what really happened
RECOVER
from a known repair
FlowNote Rails
Payments · programmable debt · settlement
Stablecoins · smart contracts · chains
AI that remembers every failure

FlowNote Graph remembers what broke and what fixed it, so the next agent inherits the repair.

Debt as an object

A receivable software can split, transfer, finance and settle on its own.

Measured on Base mainnet, paired A/B, April 2026
3,083
Transactions
99.9%
Completed with FlowNote OS
81.9%
Completed with blind retry
195
Reverts prevented
The technology

We make payments reliable,and credit alive.

01
FlowNote OS
AI payment reliability
Validate
Check the action against real state before it touches a contract. A stale intent never executes.
Execute
Redeem, swap, bridge and settle commit as one unit. A failed leg unwinds the legs that already landed.
Observe
Track what actually happened on chain, not what the agent assumed. Nonce decides, not the caller.
Recover
FlowNote Graph matches the failure to a fix that already worked. No diagnosis, no second model call.
99.9% of tasks completed against 81.9% on blind retry, over 3,083 Base mainnet transactions.
02
FlowNote Rails
Programmable debt
Multi-asset adapter
Wraps tokens that never implemented EIP-3009, so USDT, DAI and the rest can authorize a payment by signature.
Aggregated settlement
Payer sends what they hold, payee receives what they want. Cross-currency swap and split routing happen inside the payment.
Asset mapping
LP positions, vault shares and staking derivatives become spendable at live net asset value, without unwinding first.
Composable credit
A payment obligation becomes an object that can be pledged, split, financed and settled. Terms, at last, on chain.
This is the layer that turns a 90-day payable into something software can operate.
Business model
Phase 1 · now
Settlement fees

Basis points on every payment an AI agent runs through FlowNote. The fee model a card network has charged for fifty years, on machine volume instead of human checkout. We can charge it because without us one payment in five fails.

$10.2T
settled in stablecoins last year. Our fee applies to the share of it an agent runs.
Phase 2 · 2027
Financing spread, and a wider reliable network

Capital lends at one rate, the supplier borrows at another, and we keep part of the gap. Every agent that installs us for reliability brings the payment flow those claims come from.

~1%
of financed volume per 90-day cycle, and the same dollar turns four times a year.
Phase 3 · at scale
Run the credit market

Once a claim is an object, pricing, matching and allocation of trade credit all happen on our layer. Capital bids for the flow, and the spread goes to whoever routes it best.

Stripe for AI agents
What we sell keeps upgrading: execution, then credit, then the market itself.
Traction

Traction

2,000
Active users
Building on FlowNote OS today
99.9%
Payment success rate
Against 81.9% when a blind retry is the only recovery
195
Reverts prevented
Across 3,083 paired transactions on Base mainnet
$40K
Settled in production
Over five months, with no funding and no sales team
In Conversation & Partnership
5 Enterprises
DoorDashDoorDash
TempoTempo
CoinbaseCoinbase
MoonPayMoonPay
PrivyPrivy
Core moat · part one

A model is allowed to be wrong.The repair underneath it is not.

The FlowNote OS pipeline, on every call an agent makes
01
Validate
Check the action against real state before it runs
02
Execute
Commit it as one unit of work, once or not at all
03
Observe
Read what actually happened on chain, not what was assumed
04
Recover
Classify the failure, score candidate repairs, apply the proven one
05
Verify
Confirm on chain that the repair actually worked
06
Remember
Write the pattern and the fix into FlowNote Graph
Frontier models plateau. FlowNote OS does not.

Ten production revert messages from Base mainnet. Each model classifies the failure cause, then the same set runs through the pipeline.

GPT-4o-mini
50%
GPT-4o
80%
Claude Opus 4.6
90%
GPT-5.4-mini
90%
GPT-5.4
90%
FlowNote OS
100%
All five failed the same case: execution reverted with no reason string. They default to guessing gas. It was slippage.
Three modes, three risk levels
ObserveDiagnose only, never touch the callZero risk
AutoDiagnose, repair parameters, retryChanges how, never what
FullAdds fund movement strategiesOpt in
Core moat · part two

One agent fails.The next one is already immune.

Cold path, once per failure class
Step 01
A new failure arrives
A revert nobody has classified before.
Step 02
The model reasons it out
Diagnose the cause, propose and score repairs.
Step 03
The repair is written down
Pattern and fix enter FlowNote Graph, scored by reinforcement learning on whether it actually worked.
2,140ms
cold
$0.49
per repair, cold
Warm path, every time after, for every agent
Step 01
The same pattern is matched
Against everything FlowNote Graph already holds.
Step 02
The proven repair runs
No diagnosis. No model call. No new failure mode invented under pressure.
1.1ms
warm, a 1,900x speed-up
$0.00
per repair, warm
What this means
Fix once, immune forever
The cost of a failure class is paid exactly once, by whoever hits it first. Every agent that follows, at every customer, gets the answer for nothing. FlowNote Graph is the only part of the stack that gets cheaper and safer the more it is used.
Core moat · part three

It does not wait for us to improve it.It improves itself.

Meta-learning
Three fixes make a rule

When three similar repairs succeed, the system generalises them into a pattern. The fourth failure of that shape is solved instantly, without ever having been seen.

Self-play
Finds the failure before the customer does

The runtime generates and runs its own error scenarios against the adapters, so new failure classes enter the map before they cost anyone a payment.

Federated learning
Learns across customers, shares nothing

Repair scores improve from every deployment without any customer’s transaction data leaving their environment. The pattern travels, the payload does not.

Self-refine
Retries its own reasoning

When a repair fails verification, the diagnosis is refined against the new evidence rather than thrown away.

Safety verifier
Seven constraints before anything executes

A proposed repair is checked against hard limits first. A repair that would move funds it should not never reaches the chain.

Adapter coverage
40 payment failure patterns today

Coinbase 17, Tempo 13, Privy 7, generic HTTP 3. New platforms are an adapter, not a rewrite.

Core moat · part four

The same discipline, applied to the claiminstead of the payment.

FlowNote Rails, four layers
Layer 01
Multi-asset adapter
Wraps non-3009 tokens into a signable authorization
Layer 02
Aggregated settlement
Cross-currency swap and split routing, inside the payment
Layer 03
Asset mapping
LP, vault and staking positions spendable at live value
Layer 04
Composable credit
The obligation becomes a transferable, pledgeable object
What a payment request becomes
402 returned
The server asks for payment and states amount, asset and network.
Asset chosen
The payer signs with whatever they hold, including a yield-bearing position or a claim on someone else.
Route resolved
Settlement converts, splits and routes so the payee receives exactly what they asked for.
Credit settled
If the asset is an obligation, the claim is registered, pledged or discharged as part of the same transaction.
Executed once
The whole path commits under the same guarantees as a simple transfer. It cannot half happen.

This is why the reliability work had to come first. A claim that can be split and pledged is only safe if the execution underneath it cannot leave the claim in two places at once.

Competition

Four categories touch agent payments.None of them was built for credit an agent can run.

↑ Agent-native
General-purpose AI agents
Good reasoning and automation. No financial primitives, no execution guarantees.
OpenAI · Anthropic · agent frameworks
FlowNote
Programmable credit, operated by agents, executed reliably, settled onchain.
FlowNote OS · FlowNote Graph · FlowNote Rails
Stablecoin & payment rails
Instant settlement. Transfers only, with no terms, no credit and no claim.
Circle · Bridge / Stripe · x402
DeFi / RWA lending
Onchain credit. Not built for multi-tier trade workflows.
Centrifuge · Maple · Huma · Goldfinch
Banks & factoring platforms
Real credit, underwritten by people, one deal at a time. Stops at Tier-1.
HSBC · Citi · Taulia · C2FO · PrimeRevenue
↓ Human-operated Simple payments  →  Programmable credit
GTM strategy

Start where agents already pay.Expand to where businesses already owe.

Motion 1 · now
Ship into the agent stack

One line wraps an existing payment call, so adoption needs no migration and no procurement. Developers install it, hit a failure, and keep it. Adapters for Coinbase, Tempo and Privy mean the platforms agents already pay through are covered on day one.

2,000
active users arrived this way, with no sales team
Motion 2 · next
Land the anchor buyer

One large buyer brings its whole supplier base, tier by tier. The anchor holds the credit rating, the small supplier holds the need for cash, and we sit in the gap. Onboarding a supplier is onboarding a payment they were already going to receive.

5 in conversation
DoorDash, Tempo, Coinbase, MoonPay, Privy
Motion 3 · at scale
Bring the capital to the flow

Once financed volume is visible and repayment history is onchain, institutional capital prices it directly. Cheaper capital tightens supplier rates, which attracts more suppliers, which deepens the flow.

The loop closes
Volume attracts capital, capital lowers the rate, the rate attracts volume
Anchor buyer
Tier-1
Tier-2
Tier-3
Financed volume
Capital wants in
Cheaper rate
Roadmap

From one agent’s invoiceto every agent on the chain.

Phase 1 · 0–6 months
The first invoice becomes a program

One anchor buyer confirms one real payable. We mint it onchain as a receivable that accrues by the second, and the Tier-1 supplier is paid out of it. No PDF, no phone call, no bank in the middle.

Phase 2 · 6–12 months
Credit reaches the bottom of the supply chain

That same receivable splits and moves down: Tier-1 to Tier-2 to Tier-3. The small supplier borrows against the anchor's credit rating instead of its own, and gets cash in seconds instead of waiting out 90-day terms.

Phase 3 · 12–24 months
Capital funds the flow, and we earn on it

Outside pools price the book off repayment history that is already onchain. We take the spread on the financing and a fee on every settlement, and any agent can reach all of it through one API.

Team

Global exchanges, Web3 go-to-marketand Frontier AI, in one team.

Elijah Tan
Elijah
CEO
Experience
Goldman SachsClient Valuations, Asia

Seven years in Singapore across margin lending and valuations.

BinanceHead of Spot Trading Ops

Scaled the spot team 5x. Took Tokocrypto to #1 in Indonesia in 11 months.

Nick Hardy
Nick
CMO
Experience
BlockSafe SolutionsDirector of Operations & Marketing

Led brand positioning and content marketing for blockchain infrastructure.

FACEITSenior Operations Manager

Ran global esports tournament operations and publisher partnerships.

Thank You
Appendix AProof

We ran it against blind retry on mainnet, in public.

3,083
Transactions
99.9%
Completed with FlowNote OS
81.9%
Completed with blind retry
195
Reverts prevented
How the test ran

Every failure scenario was sent to both arms at the same block on Base (chain 8453). Control retried blindly on revert. FlowNote OS ran the full validate–execute–observe–recover path with a repair lookup.

And in production services
91%
Autonomous resolution
$0
Model cost per repair
<1 ms
On a cached pattern

Across 4 production services. A known failure is a lookup, not an inference call.

Every transaction hash is public. You can check the whole run.
Raw transaction data, repair-strategy breakdown and methodology are published alongside the result.
Appendix BFlowNote Graph

A failure is expensive once. After that it's a lookup.

The first time
Step 01
Something breaks
A failure nobody has recorded before.
Step 02
The model works out why
It reasons about the cause and proposes a repair.
Step 03
The repair is written down
Pattern and fix are stored in FlowNote Graph.
Every time after
Step 01
The same failure
Matched against what FlowNote Graph already holds.
Step 02
The known repair is applied
No diagnosis. No model call.
<1 ms
On a cached pattern
$0
Model cost per repair
91%
Autonomous resolution
across 4 production services

The system gets more reliable as it runs, and every agent inherits what the others learned.
Base mainnet A/B, April 2026: 99.9% vs 81.9% blind retry over 3,083 transactions, 195 reverts prevented.

Appendix CPayment reliability

What a payment needsbefore an agent can hold the pen.

Atomicity
All five steps, or none

A failed bridge unwinds the redeem and swap that already succeeded.

Idempotency
A retry is not a second payment

The same authorization can be replayed safely. The nonce decides.

Determinism
Same input, same effect

It doesn't matter which agent ran it, or in what order things arrived.

Time-bound authorization
Permission expires

EIP-3009 signatures carry a validity window. A stale intent can't execute later.

Traceability
Every step accounted for

What was attempted, what landed, what unwound. Recorded, not inferred.

Why it matters

A bank's payment engine takes all five for granted. Agentic payments mostly don't have them yet.

Appendix DSystem architecture

Five layers, one instruction path.

01
Multi-asset adapter
Whatever the payer holds becomes whatever the payee wants, yield-bearing balances included.
02
Settlement routing
Picks the path (redeem, swap, bridge) and commits to it as one unit of work.
03
Programmable debt
Receivables as objects: split, transfer, finance, collateralize, settle.
04
FlowNote OS
Validate, execute, observe, recover. Nothing reaches a contract without passing through it.
05
Smart contracts
Receipt token, gasless authorization, gateway: the parts already onchain.

Layers 01, 02, 04 and 05 ship today. Layer 03 is in build.

Appendix EThe AI credit lifecycle

What the agent actually does all day.

01
Verify
Do the order, the delivery and the invoice agree?
02
Price
What is this claim worth, at what rate?
03
Finance
Who funds it, and for how much?
04
Move
Split it, send it where the credit is needed.
05
Monitor
Is it being repaid? Is anything late?
06
Settle
Close it out and pay everyone.
Runs continuously

Work a bank does once a quarter, done continuously, for every invoice.

Appendix FEnd stateWhere this goes

The balance sheet this turns into.

The deposits
Money from anyone, anywhere
Deposit Earn Spend 24/7 Cross-border

A balance that never stops working.

The bank itself
FlowNote
AI
Checks · Prices · Allocates
FlowNote OS
Executes reliably · Recovers from failure
Programmable Debt
Credit · Receivables · Settlement
The loans
Claims on real trade
Financing Transferable credit Automatic settlement

Backed by goods that shipped.

A bank where both money and debt are software.
Appendix GWhere machine payments go next

A payment header was the start, not the destination.

STEP 01
A machine pays
One asset, one chain, one hop.
STEP 02
It pays in anything
From what you hold, into what they want, across chains.
STEP 03
It pays later, on terms
Against an obligation software can operate.
STEP 04
It runs the financing
Verify, price, fund and settle, reliably enough to trust with real money.

Each step is harder than the last, and each one needs the one below it. FlowNote is building for step 04.

Appendix HSources & references

Every number in this deck.

FigureWhat it measuresSource
$10.2TAdjusted stablecoin volume, trailing 12 monthsVisa Onchain Analytics, data by Allium · June 2026
$2.5TGlobal trade finance gap, ≈10% of world tradeADB Global Trade Finance Gap Survey · 2025
€4,039bnGlobal factoring & receivables finance turnoverFCI World Factoring Statistics · 2025
~$2.3TSupply-chain finance annual volumeWTO / IFC, commonly cited. Confirm primary source
3,083 · 99.9% · 81.9% · 195Paired A/B test: FlowNote OS vs blind retry, 12-hour windowBase mainnet (chain 8453) · April 2026 · every tx hash public
91% · $0 · <1 msAutonomous resolution, model cost per repair, cached-pattern latency4 production services · internal measurement
9.8% · 19.5% · 8 secTier-3 financing exampleSupply-chain financing research to date
6.0% · 3.8% · 25 bpsUnit economics exampleIllustrative pricing, not committed
FlowNote
1 / 15
←
→

Presenting this deck

Next slide→Space
Previous slide←
First / last slideHomeEnd
Jump to slide1–90
Appendix (from the last slide)↓A
Present full-screenP
Exit present modeEsc
This panel?
Seventeen slides, then one appendix slide. The deck never advances on its own.